for insight 2 - what if the organization have existing inefficient coordination process that leads it leaders felt they need full WFO. on the WFH/ hybrid side, they keep it because their coordination process is efficient and can perfom well without on site necessity?
I believe where the future of work is heading is that distributed work is unavoidable and therefore it's important for every organization to find a way to make it work.
Especially if the organization wants to grow, it's almost impossible to have all the people in the same time in the same location.
So, my suggestion (especially for organizations with growth aspirations) is to find ways to improve the coordination in the distributed environment. Just adding the WFO policy might solve some communication issues, but it will not be a long term solution.
for insight 2 - what if the organization have existing inefficient coordination process that leads it leaders felt they need full WFO. on the WFH/ hybrid side, they keep it because their coordination process is efficient and can perfom well without on site necessity?
I believe where the future of work is heading is that distributed work is unavoidable and therefore it's important for every organization to find a way to make it work.
Especially if the organization wants to grow, it's almost impossible to have all the people in the same time in the same location.
So, my suggestion (especially for organizations with growth aspirations) is to find ways to improve the coordination in the distributed environment. Just adding the WFO policy might solve some communication issues, but it will not be a long term solution.