7 Comments
User's avatar
Opinion AI's avatar

technical skills get you hired, but how you handle humans and trade offs decides if you actually lead. The hard part is staying pragmatic when ego and shiny tech pull you toward over-engineering, but long term the people who keep it simple, ship, and protect their team’s energy usually win.

Gregor Ojstersek's avatar

Indeed, well said! Simple is always better, and of course the impact is crucial, not the pure output.

Opinion AI's avatar

it shows how an AI native team isn’t just about fancy tools but about structure, trust, and speed. Makes me think a lot of companies will copy the tech but not the culture, and then wonder why they never hit this kind of leverage.

Gregor Ojstersek's avatar

Right, the structure doesn’t mean a lot if the mindset and the overall culture is not aligned with it as well.

Daniil Shykhov's avatar

What stands out isn’t just the technology they’re building, it’s the way they’ve structured the team around it.

Gregor Ojstersek's avatar

Right, optimized for speed, autonomy and fast decisions!

Pawel Jozefiak's avatar

The 'treat AI as a first-class teammate' part is the operative line. Most teams aren't doing this - they're using AI to speed up existing workflows, which is genuinely different.

What OpenAI's Codex team describes is rebuilding the process around AI from scratch. That's a much harder cultural shift than adding Copilot to a sprint.

I've ended up doing something similar with my own agent setup - not as a productivity tool but as a co-executor. The mental model shift from 'what would a good tool do here' to 'what would a teammate do here' changes the interface completely.

Wrote about that design decision: https://thoughts.jock.pl/p/wiz-personal-ai-agent-claude-code-2026

How are most teams actually making this shift in practice?